#86 — Case Study: Userpilot's $900K Lean ABM playbook

June 23, 2025•8 min read

Get notified of new Field Notes

Get actionable go-to-market insights delivered weekly. No fluff, no spam, just strategy that works.

Table of Contents

Find your market

→

Get notified of new Field Notes

Get actionable go-to-market insights delivered weekly. No fluff, no spam, just strategy that works.

Why it matters: When inbound leads dried up in 2024, Userpilot pivoted to Account-Based Marketing and generated $900K in pipeline in 135 days—without expensive ABM tools. This complete playbook shows exactly how they did it.

The big picture: Most ABM platforms start at $32K+ with two-year commitments. Userpilot's "Lean ABM" approach used just $2,500/month in tools to achieve 8.8x pipeline per dollar spent.

The Problem: Why Traditional Marketing Failed

The crisis that forced the pivot:

Google algorithm changes devastated organic traffic across the industry
Companies lost up to 80% of organic reach in June 2024 alone
AI content saturation made traditional lead generation ineffective
More competition and cluttered landscape reduced conversion rates

Userpilot's specific situation: They were publishing 100+ blog posts monthly, attracting 230K visitors from organic search, but needed bigger deals from more mature companies as their platform evolved to include product analytics alongside in-app onboarding features.

The strategic realization: Inbound traffic wouldn't provide predictable growth for upmarket expansion—they needed a proactive approach to target high-value accounts.

Why Traditional ABM Tools Are Overpriced

The pricing reality check:

Lowest ABM platform quote: $32,000 with two-year commitment
Recommended ad spend: Additional $100K+ on display networks
Total first-year investment: $132K+ before seeing results

The accuracy problem: Website visitor identification tools are fundamentally unreliable. Even the most accurate tool (Clearbit) only identifies visitors correctly 42% of the time, with most tools performing significantly worse:

Clearbit: 42% accuracy
Leadfeeder: 42% accuracy
RB3: 33% accuracy
Apollo.io: 30% accuracy
Albacross: 20% accuracy
Snitcher: 14% accuracy

The insight: Reverse IP lookup and anonymized click signals from private ad networks create too much risk for the investment required.

The Solution: "Lean ABM" Framework

The Tech Stack That Actually Works

Core philosophy: Use LinkedIn as the primary channel with existing CRM infrastructure, supplemented by targeted tools for specific functions.

Essential tools breakdown:

CRM: HubSpot for campaign management, lead flows, and sales outreach
Data enrichment: Clay (evolved from Apollo + BuiltWith combination)
Intent tracking: ZenABM (custom-built API solution)
Project management: Notion databases for asset creation and task assignment
BDR prospecting: SalesLoft for personalized outreach
Total monthly cost: ~$2,500 vs. $32K+ for traditional platforms

Why this stack works: Each tool serves a specific purpose without overlap, and the total cost represents a 92% savings compared to traditional ABM platforms while maintaining full functionality.

Campaign Architecture: The Five-Stage Funnel

Stage definitions aligned with benchmarks:

Identified (5-19 points): Target accounts selected from SAM list
Aware (20-49 points): 50+ ad impressions OR 2-5 clicks OR 2-10 engagements in past 90 days
Interested/Engaged (50-79 points): 5+ clicks OR 10+ engagements from LinkedIn ads in past 90 days
Considering (80-89 points): Trial signup or demo scheduled
Selecting (90-89 points): Open sales opportunity
Customer (100 points): Closed-won deal

Content strategy by stage:

Identified/Aware: Educational content, competitor comparisons, thought leadership
Interested: Feature demonstrations, case studies, benefit-focused messaging
Considering/Selecting: Product trials, customer testimonials, ROI calculators

Critical insight: Accounts automatically progress through stages based on engagement, with different ad content served at each level to match their buying journey position.

Technical Implementation: The API Solution

The LinkedIn-HubSpot integration challenge: As of February 2025, you cannot natively push company-level engagement data from LinkedIn Campaign Manager to HubSpot.

ZenABM custom solution: Built to push both quantitative metrics (impressions, clicks, engagements) and qualitative data (specific campaign interactions) into HubSpot company properties.

Why this matters: BDRs can see exactly which campaigns an account engaged with, enabling highly personalized outreach messages based on demonstrated intent.

Workflow automation: HubSpot workflows automatically update ABM stages and assign accounts to BDRs when they hit "interested" threshold, with intent tags copied to lead level for targeted messaging.

Execution: Campaign Structure and Content

Overcoming LinkedIn's Limitations

LinkedIn's constraints:

Minimum audience size of 300 members per campaign
Only one asset type (video, image, text, etc.) per campaign
API obfuscates engagements from fewer than 3 company members

The solution - Campaign Group structure:

Campaign Groups: Organized by intent/messaging theme (e.g., "Session Replay," "Analytics," "All-in-One")
Individual Campaigns: Different ad formats within each group (video, image, text, etc.)
Targeting: Single audience of 2000+ companies with job function filters

Scoring methodology: Account scoring based on Campaign Groups (not individual campaigns) to maximize signal strength and overcome LinkedIn's minimum thresholds.

Content Creation: The 150-Asset System

Asset distribution by stage:

Awareness: 19 assets (9 images, 4 videos, 3 TLAs, 1 DM, 1 document, 1 text)
Engagement: 15 assets (8 images, 4 videos, 1 TLA, 1 DM, 1 event)
Consideration: 8 assets (6 images, 2 videos)

Top-performing ad formats by performance:

Single image ads: Highest CTR, lowest cost per click
Video ads: Strong engagement, good completion rates
Thought Leader Ads: High CTR but misleading metrics (counts all clicks including "read more")

Content themes that convert:

"Before vs. After" visual comparisons
Competitor switching narratives
All-in-one platform consolidation benefits
Session replay demonstrations
Office/workplace memes with product integration

Project management system: Notion databases track asset creation across 8 personas, with automated task assignment to graphic designers when briefs are completed.

Account Targeting: The Scientific Approach

Primary list building criteria:

Companies previously contacted by SDRs (February-August 2024)
Web application businesses
Employee size: 10-1,000
Geographic focus: USA, Canada, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Israel
Total accounts: 1,417

Advanced targeting for specific campaigns:

Firmographic fit: SMB (50-500 employees) or Mid-Market (500-2,000 employees)
Revenue threshold: $5M+ annual revenue or comparable funding
Industry focus: Digital-first companies (SaaS, eCommerce, EdTech, FinTech, HealthTech) with product-led growth models

Technographic indicators using Clay + BuiltWith:

Currently using or previously used specific competitors
Using redundant tool combinations that Userpilot consolidates
Missing critical features that caused previous deal losses

CRM data mining: Analyze closed-lost deals for "missing critical features" to identify accounts ready for re-engagement when those features are available.

Results and Optimization

Performance Metrics and ROI

2025 ambitious goal: Generate $3.5M in pipeline with $350K ad spend (target: $10 pipeline per dollar spent).

Actual 135-day performance:

Total spend: $107,000 ($98,673 ads + $8,000 tools)
Pipeline generated: $872,966
Closed-won deals: $189,816
Pipeline per dollar: $8.8 (slightly under $10 target)
Accounts touched: 5,548

Team efficiency comparison:

ABM team: 4.5 full-time people (1 ABM manager, 0.5 performance manager, 1 marketing ops, 1 head of marketing, 0.5 demand gen + 0.5 PMM, 1 graphic designer)
Speed advantage: 2x faster pipeline generation than cold outbound
Cost advantage: 51% lower cost than cold outbound for same pipeline volume

Optimization Levers for Continuous Improvement

Creative testing priorities:

A/B test different visual formats (before/after, memes, product demos)
Test messaging angles (competitor switching vs. consolidation vs. feature benefits)
Experiment with video lengths and completion rates

Bidding strategy optimization:

Move from cost-per-click to target CPM for Thought Leader Ads
Test different bid amounts based on campaign group performance
Adjust budgets based on pipeline per dollar metrics

Account targeting refinement:

Continuously analyze which account characteristics drive highest conversion
Expand successful segments, pause underperforming ones
Use closed-won analysis to refine ideal customer profile

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Setup complexity: Allow 2+ months for preparation including RevOps setup, system integration, hiring experienced ABM manager, and creating initial asset library.

Tool selection mistakes: Avoid expensive ABM platforms that rely on inaccurate visitor identification—focus on proven channels like LinkedIn with solid CRM integration.

Content creation bottlenecks: Distribute asset creation across entire marketing team using project management systems, don't rely on single content creator.

Attribution challenges: Ensure proper API integration to track both quantitative metrics and qualitative campaign engagement for BDR personalization.

The Strategic Framework for Founders

When ABM Makes Sense

Ideal conditions:

Moving upmarket to larger deal sizes
Inbound channels showing diminishing returns
Need for predictable pipeline generation
Ability to invest 2+ months in setup

Resource requirements:

Minimum team: 1 dedicated ABM manager, 0.5 marketing ops, access to design resources
Budget: $2,500/month tools + $8,000+/month ad spend minimum
Time commitment: 2 months setup, 3+ months to see meaningful results

Success Metrics to Track

Key performance indicators:

Pipeline per dollar spent (target: $8-10)
Account progression through stages
Cost per stage advancement
BDR conversion rates from warmed accounts

The bottom line: ABM isn't just for enterprise companies with massive budgets. With the right "Lean ABM" approach, startups can efficiently move upmarket, build predictable pipeline, and achieve better ROI than traditional outbound methods—but only with proper setup, realistic expectations, and commitment to the process.

This structure reduces the number of top-level headings from 9 to 4 main sections, creating better hierarchy and making the table of contents more manageable while maintaining all the detailed information.

Frequently asked questions

How much should a startup budget for ABM tools and ad spend monthly?

Userpilot's 'Lean ABM' approach costs just $2,500/month in tools plus minimum $8,000/month in LinkedIn ad spend. This is 92% cheaper than traditional ABM platforms that start at $32,000+ with two-year commitments. For comparison, they achieved $8.8 pipeline per dollar spent versus the $10 target.

What's the minimum team size needed to run an effective ABM campaign?

You need at least 4.5 full-time people: 1 ABM manager, 0.5 performance manager, 1 marketing ops, 1 head of marketing, 0.5 demand gen + 0.5 PMM, and 1 graphic designer. Userpilot's team generated pipeline 2x faster than cold outbound at 51% lower cost with this structure.

How long does it take to see results from ABM campaigns?

Allow 2+ months for setup and 3+ months to see meaningful results. Userpilot generated $650k in pipeline after 3 months and nearly $900k after 4.5 months. The setup phase includes RevOps integration, hiring experienced ABM managers, and creating 150+ campaign assets.

Why are expensive ABM platforms like 6sense and Demandbase not worth it for startups?

Website visitor identification tools are fundamentally unreliable - even Clearbit only identifies visitors correctly 42% of the time. Most tools perform worse: Apollo.io (30%), Albacross (20%), Snitcher (14%). You're paying $32,000+ for inaccurate data when LinkedIn ads with proper CRM integration deliver better results.

What's the difference between ABM campaign structure by persona versus intent?

Userpilot switched from persona-based to intent-based campaign groups and saw better results. Instead of separate campaigns for 'Product Managers' vs 'CXOs,' they created campaigns around 'Session Replay,' 'Analytics,' and 'All-in-One' messaging. This captures overlapping responsibilities where different roles influence the same buying decisions.

How do you track LinkedIn ad engagement data in HubSpot for ABM scoring?

LinkedIn doesn't natively push company-level engagement to HubSpot as of February 2025. Userpilot built ZenABM, a custom API solution that pushes both quantitative metrics (impressions, clicks) and qualitative data (specific campaign interactions) into HubSpot company properties for BDR personalization.

What LinkedIn ad formats perform best for B2B ABM campaigns?

Single image ads have the highest CTR and lowest cost per click, followed by video ads and Thought Leader Ads. However, TLA metrics are misleading because LinkedIn counts all clicks including 'read more' and profile clicks. DM ads are extremely expensive for conversions but text ads work well for brand awareness.

How many target accounts should a startup include in their first ABM campaign?

Start with 1,400-2,000 accounts maximum. Userpilot targeted 1,417 accounts in their first campaign and touched 5,548 total accounts. LinkedIn requires minimum 300 members per campaign audience, so smaller lists limit your campaign structure options and reduce signal strength for account scoring.

What account scoring thresholds should I use for ABM stage progression?

Use Kyle Poyar's ABX benchmarks: Identified (5-19 points), Aware (20-49 points), Interested (50-79 points), Considering (80-89 points), Selecting (90-99 points). Userpilot moves accounts to 'Interested' at 5+ clicks or 10+ engagements, then assigns them to BDRs for personalized outreach based on campaign engagement data.

How do you build target account lists for ABM without expensive data tools?

Start with your CRM data of companies previously contacted by SDRs, then use Clay + BuiltWith APIs for technographic data. Userpilot analyzed closed-lost deals for 'missing critical features' to identify re-engagement opportunities. Focus on digital-first companies ($5M+ revenue, 50-2,000 employees) using competitor tools or redundant tool combinations.

What's the ROI difference between ABM and cold outbound for startups?

ABM generates pipeline 2x faster than cold outbound at 51% lower cost. Userpilot's ABM achieved $8.8 pipeline per dollar spent with their 4.5-person team, while traditional outbound required more resources and longer cycles. However, ABM requires 2+ months setup time versus outbound's immediate start capability.

How many creative assets do you need for a comprehensive ABM campaign?

Plan for 150+ assets across 8 personas including images, videos, Thought Leader Ads, DMs, documents, and text ads. Userpilot's breakdown: 19 awareness assets, 15 engagement assets, 8 consideration assets. Use Notion databases to manage asset creation and assign tasks to graphic designers automatically.

Should startups use ABM instead of inbound marketing and SEO?

ABM complements rather than replaces SEO and inbound marketing. Use SEO to enhance ABM visibility by optimizing for branded searches and competitor comparison keywords. When inbound leads decline (like the 80% organic traffic loss many companies saw in June 2024), ABM provides predictable pipeline generation while SEO builds long-term authority.

How do you integrate SEO with ABM campaigns for maximum impact?

Create content clusters around target account pain points and optimize comparison pages for competitor keywords. Use SEO performance data to identify high-intent keywords, then incorporate these into ABM messaging. Build branded search dominance with G2 reviews, PR mentions, and strategic partnerships to support ABM outreach credibility.

What are the biggest ABM mistakes startups make in their first campaign?

Common mistakes include: targeting too few accounts (under 1,000), relying on inaccurate visitor identification tools, creating persona-based instead of intent-based campaigns, and underestimating setup time. Many startups also fail to integrate proper API solutions for tracking engagement data, limiting BDR personalization effectiveness.

How do you measure ABM success beyond pipeline generation?

Track account progression velocity through stages, cost per stage advancement, BDR conversion rates from warmed accounts, and engagement depth by campaign group. Monitor which intent signals (Session Replay, Analytics, All-in-One) drive highest conversion rates to optimize budget allocation and creative development.

Can ABM work for early-stage startups without enterprise customers?

Yes, but focus on SMB accounts (50-500 employees) with $5M+ revenue rather than enterprise. Early-stage startups should target 1,000-1,500 accounts, use simpler campaign structures, and prioritize single image ads over expensive video production. The key is proving product-market fit with smaller accounts before scaling to enterprise ABM.

What's the difference between one-to-many, one-to-few, and one-to-one ABM?

One-to-many ABM targets 1,000+ accounts with shared characteristics using LinkedIn ads (Userpilot's approach). One-to-few targets 50-100 accounts with semi-personalized campaigns. One-to-one creates completely custom campaigns for 5-10 strategic accounts. Startups should begin with one-to-many to identify high-intent accounts before investing in personalized approaches.

How do you handle ABM attribution when multiple touchpoints influence deals?

Use campaign group-level attribution rather than individual campaign tracking to maximize signal strength. Userpilot's ZenABM API pushes both quantitative metrics and qualitative campaign engagement data to HubSpot, enabling BDRs to reference specific content interactions during outreach for better attribution visibility.

What technographic data should startups prioritize for ABM targeting?

Focus on competitor tool usage and redundant tool combinations using BuiltWith API. Target companies using both engagement tools + analytics tools that Userpilot consolidates, or companies using direct competitors lacking specific features. This technographic approach identifies accounts with clear switching motivation and budget allocation.

Keep reading

#87 — The Upgraded Go-to-Market playbook

Traditional marketing and growth channels are in a grim state. They’re crowded. They’re expensive. And to make matters worst, consumers and businesses are responding less to traditional marketing playbooks as novelty has waned.

#88 — The Programmatic Influencer Marketing (pIM) playbook

Instead of ad-hoc one-off collaborations, move to systematic content series over months and many smaller influencers.

#85 — What is a Product Marketing Manager?

A no-fluff deep-dive on what a Product Marketing Manager really does and how they're unique from other roles.

View more →