#84 — Why MCP is useful: An introduction to MCP for skeptics
June 19, 2025•9 min read

Get actionable go-to-market insights delivered weekly. No fluff, no spam, just strategy that works.
Get actionable go-to-market insights delivered weekly. No fluff, no spam, just strategy that works.
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has been making waves in developer circles, triggering passionate debates about whether it's revolutionary infrastructure or just another overhyped solution looking for a problem. For startup founders watching from the sidelines, here's your complete playbook for understanding, evaluating, and implementing MCP to build sustainable competitive advantages.
The bottom line up front
MCP transforms how AI assistants connect to your existing tools and data sources. Instead of building custom integrations for every service your team uses, MCP creates a standardized way for AI to talk to everything from your CRM to your codebase. Think of it as the universal adapter for AI-powered workflows.
The key insight: MCP isn't about the AI itself—it's about making your existing business tools AI-accessible without rebuilding everything from scratch. This is the difference between having an AI assistant that can only chat versus one that can actually execute complex workflows across your entire tech stack.
Why founders should care (beyond the hype)
Faster time-to-AI-value: Your team already uses dozens of tools. MCP lets you connect AI assistants to these existing workflows without custom development work. Need your AI to pull customer data from Salesforce, check inventory in your warehouse system, and update project status in Notion? MCP makes this possible through a single protocol.
Reduced integration debt: Every custom AI integration your team builds becomes technical debt. MCP standardizes these connections, meaning you write integration code once and it works across different AI platforms. This is architectural thinking, not just feature development.
Competitive moat through AI workflows: While your competitors are still manually switching between tools, your team could be using AI that seamlessly orchestrates complex multi-step processes across your entire tech stack. This isn't just efficiency—it's a fundamental operational advantage.
Plugin architecture benefits: MCP operates like a plugin system where the client speaks one protocol to any number of specialized servers. Adding Slack integration means deploying a Slack MCP server—no client changes required. This separation of concerns prevents integration bloat and maintains system flexibility.
Strategic Assessment Framework
The reality check: When MCP makes sense
You're a good fit if:
- Your team uses 5+ SaaS tools daily
- You're already experimenting with AI assistants like Claude or ChatGPT
- You have basic technical resources (or can hire them)
- Your workflows involve repetitive tasks across multiple systems
- You're building for the next 3-5 years, not just solving immediate problems
Skip it if:
- You're pre-product-market fit and need to focus on core features
- Your team is non-technical and you're bootstrapping
- You're already satisfied with simple AI chatbot interactions
- You can't dedicate engineering time to learning new protocols
The nuanced middle ground: If you're between these extremes, start with one specific workflow that spans 2-3 tools. Test the value proposition before committing to broader implementation.
What the critics get wrong (and right)
The "it's over-engineered" crowd has a point about complexity, but they're missing the forest for the trees. Yes, MCP uses JSON-RPC over stdio and has its own transport negotiation. But for founders, the question isn't whether it's elegant—it's whether it solves real problems faster than alternatives.
The security concerns are legitimate but manageable. MCP servers run code on your systems, so treat them like any other software dependency: review before installing, use trusted sources, and implement proper access controls. The security model is the same as any code execution environment—don't run code you don't trust.
The "just use REST" argument misses the point entirely. MCP enables multistep workflows with persistent context, dynamic tool discovery, bidirectional communication, and session management across tools. These aren't CRUD operations—they're conversational interactions that require state management.
The competitive landscape reality
Major players are already building MCP ecosystems. Anthropic (Claude), along with developers from Cloudflare, LangChain, and Vercel, are actively contributing to the specification. The community has built over 15,000 MCP servers in just six months.
Translation for founders: This isn't a science experiment. It's becoming infrastructure that your AI-forward competitors will likely adopt. The question is whether you'll be early enough to gain advantages or late enough to be playing catch-up.
Market timing indicators: Companies are already building MCP-based developer tools, MCP app stores, AI automation services, and consulting practices around implementation. The ecosystem is moving beyond experimental to commercial.
Implementation and Execution
Implementation strategy for startups
Phase 1: Proof of concept (Week 1-2)
- Pick one repetitive workflow that spans 2-3 tools
- Build or find an MCP server that connects them
- Measure the time savings and workflow improvement
- Document what works and what doesn't
Phase 2: Strategic expansion (Month 1-3)
- Identify 3-5 high-impact workflows for MCP integration
- Think ecosystem: choose implementations that scale as you add tools
- Budget for learning curve: your technical team needs time to understand MCP concepts
- Factor protocol learning into sprint planning
Phase 3: Competitive advantage (Month 3-6)
- Build proprietary MCP servers for your unique business logic
- Create AI workflows that competitors can't easily replicate
- Use MCP to enable customer-facing AI features
- Consider building MCP servers as products themselves
Technical implementation notes:
- MCP servers can be simple scripts or complex cloud services
- The protocol supports stdio, Streamable HTTP, and other transports
- Dynamic tool discovery allows servers to add/remove capabilities at runtime
- Resources, prompts, and completables extend basic tool functionality
Business model opportunities
For technical founders:
- Build MCP-based developer tools that simplify adoption
- Create MCP monitoring and performance tracking tools
- Develop specialized MCP servers for vertical markets
- Offer MCP integration platforms for enterprises
For non-technical founders:
- MCP consulting and implementation services
- No-code/low-code AI automation platforms using MCP
- Industry-specific AI workflow solutions
- MCP marketplace and discovery platforms
Revenue model considerations: The MCP ecosystem needs sustainable monetization. Think mobile app marketplace models—premium connectors, automation scripts, and enterprise integrations can create new revenue streams while fostering innovation.
Enterprise considerations
Security and trust challenges: Current MCP relies on honor-based systems. Enterprises need centralized authorities or "Play Store"-like models for MCP connectors with vulnerability scans and robust trust chains.
Cloud/SaaS limitations: Claude only supports MCP in desktop apps, not web platforms. Self-hosting requirements create deployment friction. Fully managed MCP SaaS offerings could eliminate these barriers.
Workflow orchestration gaps: Current MCP clients operate as atomic entities. Enterprises need workflow automation layers that enable complex processes across multiple connectors.
Deployment complexity: Setting up MCP clients with correct JSON configuration shouldn't require hours of troubleshooting. Streamlined deployment resembling mobile app installations is necessary for adoption.
Risk mitigation strategies
Protocol evolution risk: MCP is still maturing. Build abstractions that can adapt to specification changes. Don't couple your core business logic too tightly to current MCP implementations.
Vendor lock-in concerns: While MCP is open source, ensure your implementations can work with multiple AI platforms. Don't build exclusively for Claude or any single provider.
Security and compliance: Implement proper access controls, audit trails, and data governance from day one. Treat MCP servers as critical infrastructure components.
Talent and expertise: MCP requires technical sophistication. Plan for hiring or training developers who can work with the protocol effectively.
Success metrics and KPIs
Immediate metrics (0-3 months):
- Time saved on specific workflows
- Number of manual steps eliminated
- Error reduction in multi-tool processes
- Developer productivity improvements
Strategic metrics (3-12 months):
- Customer feature adoption enabled by MCP
- Revenue impact from AI-powered capabilities
- Competitive advantages gained through workflow automation
- Technical debt reduction from standardized integrations
Long-term indicators (12+ months):
- Market position relative to AI-native competitors
- Customer retention improvements from AI features
- New revenue streams enabled by MCP capabilities
- Operational leverage from AI workflow automation
Strategic Decision Framework
The founder's strategic framework
Evaluate MCP through these lenses:
Operational efficiency: Will MCP-enabled workflows save significant time on repetitive tasks? Can you quantify the productivity gains?
Competitive differentiation: Can you build AI workflows that competitors can't easily replicate? Do you have proprietary data or processes that become more valuable through AI integration?
Customer value creation: Can MCP enable customer-facing features that increase retention or willingness to pay? Does it unlock new product capabilities?
Technical debt management: Will MCP reduce long-term integration complexity, or add another layer to maintain?
Market positioning: Are you building for an AI-native future, or trying to retrofit AI onto existing processes?
The founder's verdict
MCP represents a bet on AI-native workflows becoming standard business practice. For founders building for the next 3-5 years, ignoring this trend could mean watching competitors automate processes you're still doing manually.
The protocol has rough edges and the tooling is still maturing. But the core value proposition—standardized AI-tool integration—addresses a real problem that will only grow as AI adoption accelerates.
The strategic question: Will your startup be building AI workflows or still debating whether they're worth the complexity?
The timing consideration: Early adopters gain advantages from learning curves and ecosystem positioning. Late adopters face commoditized solutions and established competitive moats.
The execution reality: MCP success requires technical commitment, strategic thinking, and patience with emerging technology. It's not a quick fix—it's infrastructure for AI-native operations.
This isn't just about adopting a new protocol. It's about positioning your startup for a future where AI workflows are table stakes, and competitive advantage comes from how well you've integrated intelligence into your operations.
MCP servers are available for most major business tools, with new integrations launching weekly. The specification is open source and backed by major AI companies. The question isn't whether MCP will matter—it's whether you'll be ready when it does.
Frequently asked questions
What's the actual ROI of implementing MCP for a startup with 10-50 employees?
How much does it actually cost to implement MCP servers for a small business?
Which MCP security vulnerabilities should founders be most concerned about?
Can MCP replace our existing API integrations, or does it add another layer of complexity?
What happens if MCP becomes obsolete - are we building on unstable ground?
How do I know if my startup is ready for MCP implementation?
What's the difference between MCP and tools like Zapier or Make.com for workflow automation?
Which industries see the biggest impact from MCP adoption?
How does MCP handle data privacy and compliance requirements like GDPR or HIPAA?
What's the learning curve for developers to build and maintain MCP servers?
Can MCP work with existing AI platforms like OpenAI's GPT models, or is it Claude-specific?
What are the most common MCP implementation mistakes that kill ROI?
How does MCP compare to traditional function calling in terms of performance and reliability?
What's the total cost of ownership for MCP vs building custom AI integrations?
How do I migrate existing AI workflows to MCP without disrupting business operations?
What monitoring and observability tools work best with MCP implementations?
How does MCP handle high-availability and disaster recovery scenarios?
What's the roadmap for MCP development and when should I expect major changes?
How do I convince my technical team to adopt MCP when they're skeptical about new protocols?
What are the specific advantages of MCP over GraphQL or REST for AI applications?
Keep reading

#83 — The APTK Framework: How to get more customers from SEO
APTK is a content marketing strategy that helps you create content that drives more revenue & traffic from search engines/LLMs.

#82 — LinkedIn Ads best-practices for startups
Should you run LinkedIn Ads? The answer depends on your product-market fit, funnel alignment, and budget.

#81 — Cold Take: Don't go deck-less when pitching investors
Yes, I know it's 2025. And yes, you still (probably) need a presentation deck. A deck is more than just a presentation aid.